How about with how Often we move around in Null Sov.. Giving us the Ability to Remotely unrent an office so we don't have them cluttering some of our asset screens up.

Could you please allow Stront in cargo holds of ships stored in carriers? It's required for the operation of an Entosis Link, but you currently cannot store a vessel in a carrier / super / titan with Strontium in the cargo hold.

You used to be able to put anything in the cargoholds of ships in a carrier hangar - that was until it was discovered you could fit Skiffs with a volume of 5,000 with cargo expanders and place 20,000+ in their cargoholds creating a jump freighter.... CCP were less than impressed hence the limits to what you can place in cargoholds.

Uh really? Skiffs used to have an unpackaged volume of 5000 m3? Because that's 5% of what it is now.

Well regardless of the details it would still be abusable today, although the details would be different.

The capture system for FozzieSov is beautiful, but the vulnerability and index-boosting mechanics make it a full time job to try and secure a newly captured system - and it's even worse if you don't make good friends with everyone in close reach of the region. In effect, the vulnerability window mechanics are backwards; systems start at maximum vulnerability, and then become less and less vulnerable (allowing established groups to invest a lot less effort and time) into holding up their guard. This is working against the stated goals of making it easier for small groups to get started, it makes taking sov into a full time job (the exact opposite of the stated goal), and the 100% guarantee of decreased vulnerability over time works against the goal of making people live in their space.

The sov system would work much better for all parties, IMO, if the vulnerability window did not start at maximum vulnerability. A system's vulnerability trend that looked something like this would be much better:

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CKieLGaUkAA1oQ7.png

Asking for a window to get some traction isn't begging for welfare.

Exactly, a very good point. One of the stated goals of the new sov system, and in particular the vulnerability window, is that alliances shouldn't have to feel that they need to work 23x7 just to hold a system. Right now it is incredibly difficult to take a system from a hostile entity and then HOLD that system long enough to get the indicies up to a level where the vulnerability window is actually down to where you can defend it. Right now all the enemy has to do is wait until you are sleeping or not very active and then a single elinking ceptor can reinforce everything you just took at 10 minutes a structure... and because your window is so large, the timer will be WAY out of your timezone.

The fact that there are many more, much easier systems to entosis leaves very little incentive to pursue systems that the CFC owns, but does not directly use. In all likelihood, it follows that Fozzie Sov will fail to breathe life into many of the stagnant reaches of nullsec, while increasing the CFC's body count.